This entry was posted on Monday, July 28th, 2008 at 10:38 am and is filed under Copyright Reform . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
posted by
CCER at
Mon, Jul 28th, 2008
From the outside looking in, The Intellectual Property and Trade Advisory Group set up by the Ministry of Industry may seem like a good way to study the proposals of the forth-coming Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), however, the superb work of Michael Geist and Canada’s Access to Information have revealed the usual one-sided perspective that the Conservative Government continues to subscribe to.
Instead of a broad cross section of educators, small business owners, creators, content owners artists, musicians and concerned citizens, the “insider” group will be comprised solely of government departments and industry lobby groups. Just as these “insiders” had free rein with Bill C-61, it seems here again they will have the ear and the law making powers of Ottawa at their beck and call.
And what about the supposed made in Canada provisions the Conservatives trumpet about Bill C-61. Hmmmm, let’s see:
ISP Provisions: Made in Canada: Negated by ACTA
Format Shifting: Made in Canada: Negated by ACTA
Time Shifting: Made in Canada: Negated by ACTA
Educational Exemptions: Made in Canada: Negated by ACTA
Private Copying of Music Provisions: Made in Canada: Negated by ACTA
Unless something can be done to amend/stop Bill C-61 the big lobby groups will seemingly have their cake and eat it too. They will get the law they crafted in Bill C-61 and be able to enforce the law through the implementation of ACTA. The Conservatives will simply be allowed to throw their hands up in the air and claim they tried to make a made in Canada bill, but this pesky ACTA go in the way.
Come on Canada, we’re smarter than this, aren’t we?
Leave a Reply












Tags: ACTA, copyright, jim prentice, michael geist