<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Response To Richard Owens&#8217; 2009 Copyright Consultation Criticisms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCER Refutes Lawyers Opinion on Canadian Copyright Consultation</title>
		<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14987</link>
		<dc:creator>CCER Refutes Lawyers Opinion on Canadian Copyright Consultation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccer.ca/?p=1151#comment-14987</guid>
		<description>[...] filled by circumspect contemplation of the minutiae of copyright law.&#8221; (Page 4) . The CCER responded saying, &#8220;Mr. Owens’ criticisms and accusations represent a direct attempt to discredit and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] filled by circumspect contemplation of the minutiae of copyright law.&#8221; (Page 4) . The CCER responded saying, &#8220;Mr. Owens’ criticisms and accusations represent a direct attempt to discredit and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Entertainment Industry Begins New Media Campaign For Draconian Copyright Laws &#124; Techne.ws</title>
		<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14906</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Entertainment Industry Begins New Media Campaign For Draconian Copyright Laws &#124; Techne.ws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccer.ca/?p=1151#comment-14906</guid>
		<description>[...] Owens claims that many of the submissions were likely made by foreigners, but as CCER notes in its own response, it required a legitimate Canadian address, and it&#039;s unlikely that many faked such a thing. Even if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Owens claims that many of the submissions were likely made by foreigners, but as CCER notes in its own response, it required a legitimate Canadian address, and it&#39;s unlikely that many faked such a thing. Even if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chronoss</title>
		<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14896</link>
		<dc:creator>chronoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccer.ca/?p=1151#comment-14896</guid>
		<description>OH and 90% said they want lessoned copyrights , go ahead ask anyone , go for a walk ask

WHAT DOES 50 year copyrights do for you citizen
and your gonna get the ....&quot;nothing&quot;
99.99999% of time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH and 90% said they want lessoned copyrights , go ahead ask anyone , go for a walk ask</p>
<p>WHAT DOES 50 year copyrights do for you citizen<br />
and your gonna get the &#8230;.&#8221;nothing&#8221;<br />
99.99999% of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chronoss</title>
		<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14895</link>
		<dc:creator>chronoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccer.ca/?p=1151#comment-14895</guid>
		<description>why isn&#039;t someone start telling this lawyer that he is getting dangerously close to slander and libel agaisnt a multitude fo people
and misrepresentation is a class actionable type of lawsuit and he also may be heading to that.

OWENS in my opinion you&#039;d a been better off shutting the hell up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why isn&#8217;t someone start telling this lawyer that he is getting dangerously close to slander and libel agaisnt a multitude fo people<br />
and misrepresentation is a class actionable type of lawsuit and he also may be heading to that.</p>
<p>OWENS in my opinion you&#8217;d a been better off shutting the hell up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NerdOfAllTrades</title>
		<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14883</link>
		<dc:creator>NerdOfAllTrades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccer.ca/?p=1151#comment-14883</guid>
		<description>Small quibble:

You wrote that &quot;What is revealed in this manipulation of consultation data is that without the submissions sent using the CCER letter wizard there is very little representation of the average Canadian consumer...&quot;

However, what was said was, in essence:
&quot;Of the 25% we sampled, we eliminated any submission that was by an average Canadian consumer, and hey, look!  90% of the remaining submissions are in favor of strong copyright.&quot;

So, that paragraph says that, within that sample, 90% of individual submissions by creators and distributors show that they are in favor of strong copyright, not that 90% of all individual submissions in that sample are by creators and distributors and in favor of strong copyright.

So, there is plenty of representation of average Canadian consumers even without the form letters.  Our IP lawyer just didn&#039;t consider our opinions worth taking note of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small quibble:</p>
<p>You wrote that &#8220;What is revealed in this manipulation of consultation data is that without the submissions sent using the CCER letter wizard there is very little representation of the average Canadian consumer&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>However, what was said was, in essence:<br />
&#8220;Of the 25% we sampled, we eliminated any submission that was by an average Canadian consumer, and hey, look!  90% of the remaining submissions are in favor of strong copyright.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, that paragraph says that, within that sample, 90% of individual submissions by creators and distributors show that they are in favor of strong copyright, not that 90% of all individual submissions in that sample are by creators and distributors and in favor of strong copyright.</p>
<p>So, there is plenty of representation of average Canadian consumers even without the form letters.  Our IP lawyer just didn&#8217;t consider our opinions worth taking note of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninja</title>
		<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14871</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccer.ca/?p=1151#comment-14871</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not Canadian but I wish you guys luck in the process. Not CCER but to all Canadians.

I&#039;ve read TF&#039;s article about this, both this response and Mr Geist response and they were very sensible. From Mr Owen&#039;s comments we can reach 3 conclusions: he&#039;s ignorant about the issue, he&#039;s just voicing the opinions of the pro-copyright groups (therefore he&#039;s biased) or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not Canadian but I wish you guys luck in the process. Not CCER but to all Canadians.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read TF&#8217;s article about this, both this response and Mr Geist response and they were very sensible. From Mr Owen&#8217;s comments we can reach 3 conclusions: he&#8217;s ignorant about the issue, he&#8217;s just voicing the opinions of the pro-copyright groups (therefore he&#8217;s biased) or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fairdealer</title>
		<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/response-to-richard-owens-2009-copyright-consultation-criticisms-2/comment-page-1/#comment-14863</link>
		<dc:creator>Fairdealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccer.ca/?p=1151#comment-14863</guid>
		<description>Amen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

