<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Canadian Coalition for Electronic Rights &#187; drm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ccer.ca/tag/drm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ccer.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another Salvo Of Fire And Brimstone B$ From The Entertainment Software Association</title>
		<link>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/another-salvo-of-fire-and-brimstone-b-from-the-entertainment-software-association/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/another-salvo-of-fire-and-brimstone-b-from-the-entertainment-software-association/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CCER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danielle Parr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tpm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ccer.ca/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Straight.com, Vancouver&#8217;s Online Source has a featured commentary by The ESA Canada&#8217;s Danielle Parr entitled Canada&#8217;s video game industry needs copyright law that protects digital locks. Nothing groundbreaking here just the rhetoric and statistical misinformation we have all come to expect from corporate lobby groups trying to scare lawmakers into protecting their flawed and antiquated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.straight.com">Straight.com</a>, <em>Vancouver&#8217;s Online Source</em> has a featured commentary by The ESA Canada&#8217;s Danielle Parr entitled <em><a href="http://www.straight.com/article-248821/danielle-parr-canadas-video-game-industry-needs-copyright-law-protects-digital-locks">Canada&#8217;s video game industry needs copyright law that protects digital locks</a></em>.  Nothing groundbreaking here just the rhetoric and statistical misinformation we have all come to expect from corporate lobby groups trying to scare lawmakers into protecting their flawed and antiquated business models.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Internet piracy of video-game software in Canada has undergone explosive growth, and we detected a stunning 300 percent increase in the number of games illegally downloaded via Canadian ISPs between 2007 and 2008 (and this reflects but a fraction of the total illegal downloads in Canada detected by the industry as a whole).&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This outrageous statement leads us to ask just how exactly did the <a href="http://www.theesa.ca">Entertainment Software Association of Canada</a> track and detect this &#8220;explosive growth&#8221; in piracy at the ISP level in Canada?  It should be very worrisome to all Canadian consumers that their privacy is being compromised to permit an American lobby group to detect and monitor the flow of illegal downloads passing through Canadian ISPs.  </p>
<blockquote><p>
Failing to protect TPMs under the law effectively means that the government is dictating the business model, which is bad news for business and for consumers.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Simply stated <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/08/06/tech-digital-locks-drm-tpm-rights-management-protection-measures-copyright-copy-protection.html">protections for TPMs and DRM do not work</a> and they do not benefit consumers or creators in the ways they are intended to.  Protecting TPMs only protects distributors and lobby groups at the expense of consumer access and creative innovation.  By failing to bend to an American lobby group such as the ESA one can hardly think that the government of Canada can be seen as &#8220;dictating&#8221; any particular business model.  By remaining technologically neutral and not integrating protection for specific technologies or business models into an amended <em>Copyright Act</em> (e.g. all-encompassing prohibition of circumvention devices and technologies) you end up with a flexible law that can adapt to protect the interests of both creators and consumers.  </p>
<p>Given the ESA&#8217;s mis-aligned approach to copyright reform, the CCER encourages Canadian lawmakers to not ignore the opinions of typical Canadians as evidenced <a href="http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/008.nsf/eng/h_00001.html">here</a>.  It would appear that The ESA is somewhat of a lone wolf in its desires to protect TPM&#8217;s as evidenced by the very low percentage of submissions to the Copyright Consultations that call for similar type legislation. One can only hope that these special interest lobby groups don&#8217;t continue to insult our intelligence or taint the media any further with their inaccurate, unfounded and most importantly false claims. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ccer.ca/canadian-copyright-reform/another-salvo-of-fire-and-brimstone-b-from-the-entertainment-software-association/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

